Enigmatic Urbanscapes: Barry Masteller¹s Boulevards
by Donald Kuspit
Is there a precedent for Barry Masteller's beautiful, haunting
boulevards? We see the same moody elegance in Gustave Caillebotte's Paris,
the Place de l'Europe on a Rainy Day, 1877--the same brooding isolation, the
same grandly empty spaces, for all the figures that inhabit them.
Masteller's cities are 21st century New York and San Francisco, and his
lights and darks are more cunningly balanced than Caillebotte's--the dark
clothing of his 19th century figures hardly makes a dent in the hazy
luminosity, while the strong radiation from Masteller's luminous windows
locks horns with the darkness (their interaction conveys the tension of the
city, hidden by its deceptively bland geometry)--but they have the same
strange spaciousness: a peculiar mix of seemingly infinitely extending
straight streets and the claustophobic intersections--deceptively broad,
open spaces--where they converge.
Caillebotte's place and Masteller's boulevards are equally grand, but
the boulevards are much more complex--not to say dramatic and
disturbing--than the place. The Parisian buildings and umbrellas are
curved, fluid structures, with an ornamental flair, the American buildings
are bleakly rational--facilely functional rectangles, with the wrap-around
Bauhaus-style windows that confirm their basicness. Whatever curves
appear, as in the sidewalk of Boulevard 53 and the pipes of Boulevard 54,
both 2005, or ornamental patterns, as in Boulevard 46 and Boulevard 47,
both 2005, seem incidental to the matter of fact look of the scene.
Masteller's light softens hard American cities, more the products of
mechanical engineering than imagination, while Caillebotte's light brings
out the softness of the Parisian surfaces, giving them an imaginative
expressiveness.
But in the end Masteller's New York City and San Francisco are much more
uncanny and fantastic than Caillebotte's place CityParis. Caillebotte observes a
scene, but Masteller invents his scenes: his pictures are abstract
constructions that convey the strangeness and alienation of urban life even
as they suggest the larger enigma of representation, hinting at its
problematic, uncertain character. Masteller is a conceptual painter: he
unites fragments of the urban environment--carefully chosen from a
repertoire of photographs--to create a kind of picture puzzle, that is, a
representation that conveys the unreal look of every convincing
representation even as it precisely realizes reality. The empirical is
subsumed in the enigmatic, making for a sense of uncanny truthfulness,
however factually bizarre the picture finally seems. Boulevard 44 and
Boulevard 45, both 2004 convey this doubleness--the sense of the
unfathomableness of reality that emerges from excruciating attention to its
detail. What Masteller finally represents is the uncanniness immanent in
space--space whose uncanniness becomes manifest because Masteller has lived
its contradictions. These are evident in the at-oddness of the buildings
and streets, and above all in the clash of light and dark. There is a hint
of latent violence in Masteller's Boulevards, for all their apparent calm.
I think Masteller's urbanscapes are a breakthrough. He has previously
been known for landscapes, influenced by Monet, as he has acknowledged. His
trees have a glowing intensity, his clouds a peculiar impenetrability, for
all their ephemerality. Masteller is clearly a master observer of
atmosphere, light and dark, natural form, and their interplay. The results
are solemnly harmonious pictures. But in the urbanscapes this facade of
harmony is broken, nature is no longer the scene, and there is a sense of
disruptive, even demonic power. Perhaps Masteller has discovered himself
through his experience of the city. The innocence of the landscape has
certainly disappeared.
No apologies for haunting beauty; it remains credible, despite the attacks
on it by different modernists, among them Duchamp and Newman. Beauty
conveys the esthetic conviction that is the core of art at its most
intimate.
Donald Kuspit 2006
Donald Kuspit is an art critic and a professor of art history and philosophy at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Kuspit is a contributing editor at Artforum, Sculpture,and New Art Examiner magazines, the editor of Art Criticism, and the editor of a series on American Art and Art Criticism for Cambridge University Press.
All text and images contained on this site copyright Barry Masteller 2008
|